|
Dear
fellow HR Practitioners,
Change
is constant and often necessary for continuation. In
nature, the ecology of nature evolves and changes are contributed by the inhabitants of that habitat. When
we introduce externally imposed change or interventions to
nature, it effectively destroys rather than help create a
better eco-system. Can we draw parallel comparison between
nature and the business ecosystem?
In
times past, we may have attempted every known program and
techniques in bringing about better organisational change
and performance. From “Total Quality Management”,
“Quality Control Circles”, “Business Process
Reengineering”, ISO Standards and more closer to
home, initiatives like “People Developer”,
“Singapore Quality Class”, “Work Redesign”,
“CREST”, “Industry Capability Upgrading Program”,
all supposedly are to bring about an outcome of
transforming organisations and driving better business
performance. Have these delivered its intended
outcomes? Or have huge amount of financial resources
and time been unable to really bring about the desired
changes for improving organisational performance?
Harvard
Professor Dr Michael Beer highlighted this in his book
"A Critical Path To Organisational Renewal",
where a key premise was that programmatic driven change in
organisations most often fail. Unfortunately the key
perpetrators of such programs are the consultants in
collaboration with senior management, and in our
local scene, even key authorities and national bodies or
institutions. Seen in a right light, the intentions
of such programs are sound, but the results unfortunately
fall way short of its intentions.
As
part of being a member of the Human Capital
Development(HCD) and Organisation Development(OD)
fraternity, my proposition is that our Community needs to
wean itself off the tendency to simply run programs
because of it being the next popular initiative or because
it is something being propagated at a national level.
The Human Capital Professional/Practitioners, having
learnt from previous futile initiatives should now be
wiser, matured and competent to take a deeper role
and ownership in charting the course of what really is
needed for its HCD and OD strategies within the
organisation. For this to happen, competencies
must be enhanced among the HCD and OD Professionals.
We need to not just understand programs but also take a
holistic and integrative view of organisation development. The
other important thing is also to heighten the
business awareness of the HCD and OD Professional so that
there is a strong link and relevance to the business goals
and strategies. HCD and OD Communities must
emerge to drive the goal for identifying and growing best
practice. This can comprise of the diversity of
stakeholders, from consultants to practicing Human
Resource and OD persons, to
representatives from the government.
Just
like the nature in the forest, we can view our HCD and OD
fraternity as being a diverse sort of inhabitants in
our unique and specialized reserve. We and only we
can bring about that change and transformation. A
transformation that will be driven in a social ecological
sense, rather than a unilateral directive and policy
making, exclusive frequently only to top
management and legislative bodies. I believe deeply
that such a community-based approach is the best manner to
help the Human Capital Development field come of age!
Training
Vision welcomes you to be such a key participant and
contributor to the journey of Transformation and
Change. To know more about who we are, continue on to our
world as captured in this web site. Let
the journey begin. ...
Your-partner-in-change
David
Kwee
|